The absurdity of Republican fiscal policies knows no bounds. We have high deficits already; deficits that are threating to drive up inflation and interest rates which would kill the next economic boom before it even happens. Deficits that the Republican party and their tax-cut mantra are responsible for. And now, thanks to two major gulf hurricanes, things are likely to get that much worse. And yet Republicans are still insistent on cutting taxes even further, although there is some debate within the party about whether or not to postpone those tax-cuts. Our ship is sinking and the Republicans are debating whether we should voluntarily take on more water today or tomorrow.
And for all the Bush apologists out there, don’t give me any of this “you can’t hold us responsible for disasters” business. Wars happen, disasters happen, tragedies happen. And when they do, the United States government has a responsibility to act, and those actions are expensive. Intelligent people prepare for disasters. It isn’t so bad for the federal government to have to borrow money. If we had a normal budget for the last few years, instead of opperating deeply in the red, when Kartina and Rita hit we could have borrowed the money to pay for them. The deficit would have shot up because of the one-time disaster payment, and then you pay it off, hopefully before the next one hits. But we can’t do that right now because we’re too much in debt already. If we really are going to follow through with the President’s commitment to Hurricane victims, if the federal government is really going to take an active role in rebuilding Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and whatever parts of Texas are destroyed by Rita, then the government will need to spend quite a bit of money. And thanks to disasterous Republican fiscal policies, that money can’t come only from borrowing, not without doing serious damage to the United States economy.
And don’t try to say that we can simply cut that money from the federal budget. Republicans have been in control of the federal government for five years now, spouting small-government rhetoric the entire time. Any programs that could easily be cut, any “fat” that could easily be trimmed, would have been do so a long time ago. Tom Delay’s reaction has been very telling; he said yesterday that he thought there was plenty of pork in last year’s notorious transportation bill, but that the more than $100 million dollars that he had gotten for his district was vital for the Houston area. We always want government to do less for others and more for us, something for which both Republicans and Democrats are equally guilty. And you know what? Many times the right answer is that government should be doing more for everyone. The United States government is already the smallest, and does the least, of just about any industrialized nation in the world. And given that we are the richest nation in the world, I think we can afford to do a bit more.
We have a fiscal crisis brewing right now. Certainly getting rid of public television isn’t the answer. Nor is further tightening already absurd Medicaid eligibility rules. (I know of a lady whose only income is the bare minimum Social Security payment, less than $10,000 per year, who was informed that she made too much money for some Medicaid programs.) Instead, we need to raise taxes. A lot. And yet you can count on one hand the number of Republicans with both the foresight and the political courage to say that. And sadly, none of them are in the White House.
Recent Comments