As I’ve mentioned before, my alarm clock is set to a talk radio show that’s extremely annoying – it helps me get out of bed quickly. This morning, in the brief time between when the alarm went off and when I managed to hit the ‘snooze’ button, I realized that the discussion of the day was doorknob safety. I’m not making this up.

The thing is, I wasn’t able to hear the intro, so I spent most of the morning trying to figure out why doorknobs were dangerous, and what could inspire talk show pundits to devote a show to their safety. I came up with some ideas:

– Children running around a corner quickly might hit their heads on the doorknob

– A sack full of doorknobs may be a cheap and effective mob enforcement weapon

– Attempting to swallow a doorknob could be a choking hazard

– Metal doorknobs conduct electricity, so if one were to hook one up to the proper power source, a person trying to open the door could get a shock.

– Metal doorknobs also conduct heat, so could burn a hand (didn’t this happen in Home Alone?).

– If it were cold enough outside, attempting to lick a doorknob could result in geting your tongue stuck

– Or most likely, people don’t wash their hands, and touch doorknobs, which then have germs on them to spread to the next person who touches them.

For now the doorknob remains a nebulous threat, the exact nature of which remains unclear. So until we can identify the danger, a warning to readers of leftfielder: Beware! The dangerous doorknobs lurk everywhere…

 

Scary, scary stuff…

 

One of the challenges in increasing security is that there is a cost in privacy for doing so. Since both are valuable, it’s tricky to figure out when the cost of privacy is too high for a given security measure. It is my belief that the current proposal of x-rays at aiports crosses that line. Take a look at that link – on the left side is a picture of somebody going through the xray machine. It’s a slightly blurred view of her nude body. I, for one, am not comfortable with the thought of strangers looking at a nude photo of me. Even for security. At the moment this is just for people who fail the basic security screening, at a single airport, and there is the option to have a pat-down instead. But if this ever gets widely adopted or is made non-optional for air travel, I would find that highly invasive, and a cost that I was unwilling to pay for the slight security increase it affords. The fact that it’s being adopted at all disturbs me somewhat.

© 2012 leftfielder.org login Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha