I couldn’t find the actual opinion piece that this article is referring to, but the summary of it is still very interesting. Basically, why did flags fly at half mast for the VaTech shootings, but not for soldiers slain in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan. Perhaps there is a qualitative difference between soldiers and civilians, but its not clear to me that such is the case, nor that civilians should deserve the honor more than soldiers.

Perhaps if flags were at half mast for soldier deaths, people would start to see the flags ALWAYS at half mast and it would serve as a constant reminder of the cost of going to war. Perhaps, then, it would be harder to persuade the country to go to war if the cause wasn’t just.

 

There is an interesting case of academic freedom coming out of Emmanuel College in Boston. A professor was fired for his classroom behavior.

The demonstration was as follows: the professor holds up a magic marker and asks his students to pretend it was a gun. He then points it at student in the room and says “bang” to illustrate that the student had been ‘shot’. Then another student in the class takes a magic marker, points it at the professor, and says bang, and the professor falls down, pretending to be shot. Continue reading »

Apr 202007
 

This post is a delightful mix of computer geek reference and political commentary. Both make it very appropriate for some who frequent this site.

 

To be honest, I’ve been trying to avoid coverage of the Virginia Tech tragedy, although I have caught some of it. I don’t care about the video messages or past of the killer. I don’t want to know about the time-line of the killings or see a 3D mock-up of the killer’s route on that day. I don’t care how messed up the killer’s roommate thought he might have been. And I don’t particularly enjoy or find it helpful to read the biographies of the victims. I’m not blaming anyone for lapping up the news coverage, and I’m not blaming the media for showing it. I’d rather live in a world where information is available than one where it isn’t, and if that information helps someone mourn or understand what happened, then that’s a great thing. It’s just not for me.

That being said, whenever a tragedy like this happens, there is a stock list of things that gets blamed:

  • Guns, or Access to Guns
  • Violent images or lyrics in one of the following:
  • Music
  • Video Games
  • Movies
  • Childhood Abuse
  • Bullying and/or Unhealthy Social Structures (e.g. cliques, frats, etc.)
  • Untreated Psychological Problems
  • The Police (or Campus Security, in this case)
  • Unresponsive Administration
  • The General Moral Degradation of America
  • The Chaos Predicted Before the End Times

Now, because I haven’t been following the coverage real well, I’m not sure which of those is bearing the brunt of the blame-game. And while maybe playing that game makes us feel better (after all, isn’t it satisfying to identify the bad-guy, especially one who isn’t dead?), it doesn’t really make a difference. Because, to a certain extent, any or all of those may have played a role in this tragedy, and any or all of them may play a role in future tragedies.

But here’s the thing. We are all capable of making choices about our own behavior. And even the most learned psychologists and social sciences cannot predict what individuals will do in real-world circumstances. Certainly violence in movies can make us more prone to acting out violently in our everyday lives, but that’s a long way off from saying that violence in movies causes us to kill each other. After all, hot weather can also make us more prone to violence, and yet living in Houston did not make me a murderer. In the same way, easy access to cheap guns most certainly allows for bad situations to be all that much more worse, but gun control laws wouldn’t have necessarily prevented any particular killer from getting access to firearms, and most gun owners are perfectly law abiding citizens.

It is both right and appropriate for us to find meaning in great tragedy, and the killings at Virginia Tech are no different. But we also need to be honest with ourselves. Sometimes bad things just happen, and there is no way of knowing how preventable this crime really was. If we really want to make the world a better place, we need to not focus on the details or cause or prevention of any individual tragedy, and instead we need to look at the big picture. This tragedy is not the fault of the NRA, or Hollywood, or the Virginia Tech administration. It’s the fault of one extremely messed up young man. It does all of us a disservice to try to make it more than that.

 

Can somebody please explain to me what the pro-choice folks are all up in arms about this supreme court decision? From what I understand, the supreme court upheld a ban on a particular procedure (partial birth abortion). They didn’t allow a ban on abortion, or make it significantly harder to get one.

Medical procedures are banned all the time because of safety or ethical concerns. Heck, lifesaving drugs are regularly banned by the FDA because of risk of side effects etc. Nobody gets up in arms about that.

I guess it just seems to me that because this procedure has to do with abortion that people are up in arms. If it were a cancer treatment, you wouldn’t have this sort of reaction – even though a cancer treatment could save a life.

A lot of people seem to be saying that this is proof that the Bush administration has succeeded in loading the court with folks who will overturn Roe v. Wade. But I just don’t see that. A majority of Americans are pro-choice in general, but a majority of Americans are opposed to this particular procedure. Seems like the court could similarly allow the banning of this procedure, without overturning Roe v. Wade…

Is it just me, or is this court decision being blown way out of proportion? Is it just that abortion is a highly politicized issue, so the people who care about it just note the topic and ignore the specifics of the case when getting riled up? Maybe someone can enlighten me as to why an upholding of a ban on a specific procedure should be viewed as a terrible tragedy for the pro-choice side of the debate…

© 2012 leftfielder.org login Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha