At last night’s State of the Union, the biggest news was about earmark reform. The President took on earmark reform with two proposals. First, he told Congress that “if you send me an appropriations bill that does not cut the number and cost of earmarks in half, I’ll send it back to you with my veto.” Second, he announced a new Executive Order, which he signed today, that instructs federal agencies to only consider those earmarks as binding that were actually passed by both Houses of Congress as part of the text of the legislation. At first glance these two things sound like a lot, and in fact most of the criticism I’ve seen has been of the form of “it took you seven years to do this?” Look a little deeper at both of these “reforms”, however, and you’ll find a lot of showmanship and virtually no substance.
Continue reading »
Recent Comments