I haven’t been posting much lately because I’ve been spending most of my time packing all of my possessions into boxes. Ah, the joys of moving. But I have been paying attention to the news, especially the resignation of Justice David Souter and the nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor. I can’t remember ever seeing a case where the absurdity of the American political dialogue was in full view as this whole conversation.

Let’s start with Justice Souter. Souter has to be one of the most conservative judges to ever serve on the Supreme Court, by any objective definition. Continue reading »

 

One of the lead articles on Yahoo News today has the link “Obama says stimulus package saved or created 150,000 jobs”. If you read the actual article you learn that this figure is an estimate based on hypothetical numbers of jobs that would have been lost had there not been a stimulus package, not any real job data.

In other words, its a totally made up number. Oh, I’m sure there were economic forecasts that went into making that number, but the thing about economic forecasts is that depending on the assumptions you make, you can get pretty much any outcome. Just look at models of supply side economics and how they parametrize the Laffer curve. The number is meaningless, it might as well be a wild guess. And yes, the media blindly reports it because its said by the president. I got annoyed when the media parroted Bush (e.g. WMDs in Iraq, scientists dispute global warming…), and I’m annoyed when they do it with Obama.

Hey media: stop giving the oval office free reign to spin the truth beyond what reasonable evidence affords. Stop publicizing fabricated stories. Or, if you’re going to spread information without asking sources to back up their claims, please note that I saved 10,000 jobs this year, foiled half a dozen terror plots, and singlehandedly prevented an incredibly virulent pandemic of llama flu that would have killed half the world’s population (you’ve never heard of it because I was successful in preventing it).

 

Today, new credit card reform legislation was voted into law. On the one hand, I didn’t like the practices of a lot of credit card companies. On the other hand, I have some serious qualms about the new legislation.

Ultimately, I worry that the result of this bill will be to protect irresponsible consumers at the expense of responsible ones. I’ve known since I got my first credit card at 16 that you should pay off your bill in full every month. If I couldn’t pay off my bill, then I shouldn’t be making purchases on a credit card. I have followed this rule, others have not.
Continue reading »

 

I really like Stanley Fish’s blog over at the New York Times. His latest articles once again return to the topic of science and religion. He makes a similar point to one that I’ve made before: science lies on a bedrock of faith–faith in reason, observation, and falsification, and therefore it is false to suppose that faith and science are at odds. Today, I want to address a further myth that seems to have taken root at least in pop culture, and comes out in a lot of the comments on Dr. Fish’s blog: the myth that science demands atheism.
Continue reading »

 

This article presents one of the more challenging dilemmas for libertarians such as myself. I thought it might be an interesting starting off point for discussion. The basic rundown: A child has cancer and could be healed with chemotherapy. The family has religious beliefs that preclude chemotherapy. The government (child protective services) has stepped in and is requiring the family to give the boy treatment, against his, and their will. Continue reading »

© 2012 leftfielder.org Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha