“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
— United States Constitution, Second Amendment

My first thought upon reading this amendment is that it immediately undercuts anyone who tries to argue for the inherent wisdom of the Founding Fathers. If they were so wise, surely they could have written a more grammatical and less obtuse sentence. Which is made even worse by the fact that we have to live with the Supreme Court’s changing interpretations of that obfuscation, the latest of which was handed down yesterday in McDonald v. Chicago.
Continue reading »

 

I read two books this weekend: Lies and the lying liars who tell them, and The Google Story. The first is a left wing polemic from Al Franken. The book is well written, funny, and incredibly depressing. It tells the story of how politicians distort the truth, how the media allows (or in some cases encourages) this deception, and ultimately gives the impression that you can’t trust anything you read in the news. (Franken only covers the lies from the right, but the left is doing the same thing…). Based on this book, as the politicians and interests groups become more and more adept at hiding and distorting, finding the truth approaches impossible.

The second book was poorly written, rather dull at times, and yet quite inspiring. It tells the story of how Google came into existence. While the book itself is terrible (going into insipid detail on people who’s contribution to the development of Google seems mostly to be that they were willing to grant an interview with the author) it impresses upon the reader that more information is available to the average citizen (and even the expert) than at any time in human history. And so in this world view, finding the truth becomes plausible.

And in some sense, I feel they’re both right. The truth is both more accessible than ever, while simultaneously being more hidden, distorted, and ignored than ever. So, this weekend’s reading was a study in contrast, on many levels.

Jun 252010
 

Jury duty is done. I didn’t get on a trial. But I did get paid my $5. That’s right, $5. For a day of jury duty, I get paid less than minimum wage for one hour. Here’s the thing – if they paid me nothing, I would be content – I would have been doing my civic duty, and just as I don’t get paid for voting, I don’t expect to get paid for jury duty (unless I’m actually put on a jury). But if you pay me $5… well, that sends the signal that I’m too mercenary to do my civic duty unless I’m given a monetary reward. And moreover, my time isn’t all that valuable, since $5 isn’t all that much.

New Jersey, like most states, is in a fiscal crunch. If they cut jury pool stipends (jury pool stipends, not actual jury stipends – people actually spending weeks away from work need to be compensated for affordability reasons, and they get closer to $50 a day), the state could save at least $500 a day in my county alone ($125,000 a year), with 21 counties in NJ, that comes to a non-trivial $2.5 million a year. Not to mention the paper and postage (they send each of us a $5 check in the mail) the accountants and whatnot who actually do the work to send out the checks, etc.

Because I don’t expect NJ to actually listen to this advice, the next best thing would be to have the option to donate your $5 to charity. Yes, I realize that I could donate it to charity when I get the check. But its harder to do that once I’ve actually gotten the money, than to pledge money that I haven’t yet received (Mevyis et. al, in press). If I were an enterprising charity, I’d go to the courts and ask them to allow people to sign up to waive their $5 to the charity. Not everybody would sign the waiver, but many would. That could be $1 million a year in New Jersey alone. That’s a lot of money that could do a lot of good…

Jun 242010
 

As you may have guessed from the title, I’m on jury duty today. The jury system is better than it used to be – these days you can call in the night before and see if they need you. Which means that monday-wednesday I was able to go to work. Today, unfortunately, they brought me into the courthouse. So far, most of what I’ve done is sit and wait. At least they have internet access.

The one thing that interrupted the waiting was the jury instructions video. It was made in the 70′s, really amateurish and unintentionally funny because of its over the top hyperbole. But the thing that most struck me about it was the glaring errors from a psychology perspective.
Continue reading »

 

I’m a big Pac-10 fan. I grew up in Los Angeles and my dad worked at USC – I grew up going to USC games (we’re not going to talk about NCAA sanctions about USC today ). I went to Stanford for grad school. I did my sabbatical at UCLA, and spent a month as a visiting scholar at Berkeley. I love the pageantry of the Rose Bowl, and the rivalries and traditions. I always root for the Pac-10 when they play other conferences, unless they happen to be playing Rice or Princeton.

This expansion thing really has me down. I realize that there are strong financial incentives to expand, but what about tradition? What about representing the west coast which faces a perpetual media bias against it in terms of sports? But today, the Pac-10 added Colorado. And I hear they’re courting Texas and Oklahoma and possibly others. At which point, it won’t really be the Pacific, or the 10. It will be the muddled 16. Continue reading »

© 2012 leftfielder.org Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha