One of the things I’m most proud of about the book is that it is non-partisan. After all, the issues we discuss (including voter irrationality, voter ignorance, procedural justice, etc.) are not limited to Democrats or Republicans, liberals or conservatives. As we note in the book “voters often are ignorant pawns of a system they don’t understand”, and that applies to all voters. And so, when discussing the book, I try both Danny and I try our best not to wade into partisan political debates. Sometimes in a particular Q&A, I will be forced to tip my hand somewhat about what I believe, but I do always try to be respectful of other political beliefs and to keep my own opinions about which particular politicians or policies are insane to myself.

That being said, Florida has now, officially, broken me. And I’m not even talking about the Stand Your Ground Law, which has gotten so much attention lately. No, the law that has raised my hackles, as far as the material in the book is concerned, is the recent restrictions on third-party voter registration.
Continue reading »

 

Maybe someone can explain to me the following bit, part of a statement released by the Chancellor of the New York City Education Department announcing over a dozen school closings:

“These are never easy decisions, but when a school has failed to serve its students well year after year — even after receiving additional supports — we have a responsibility to provide students with better options. We are already hard at work creating the great new schools that these communities deserve.”

So, as far as I can tell, the logic goes like this: Some schools are better than others. If a school continues to fail, it must be an inherent characteristic to the school. Therefore, we should close that school and open new ones. (Although please note that the new ones are not fully in place yet–”already hard at work creating” implies that the creation is an ongoing process and not one that is very far down the path to success–which seems really dumb, assuming that we are trying to minimize the disruption of the transition.)

Personally, I have two problems with that logic. Continue reading »

 

According to a New York Times article, Florida education officials recently released a set of rules requiring that all incoming students must demonstrate that their parents are legal Florida residents before they can receive in-state tuition to any public college or university. The rule, which does not affect admission, is supposedly aimed at illegal immigrants, who will find their tuition quadrupling.

While I cannot speak for the authors of the rule, my guess is that there are two reasons behind the increase:

1) To disincentivize living in Florida if you are an illegal immigrant
2) To respond to a general complaint among some voters that illegal immigrants do not pay their fair share to society, and should not be rewarded with any kind of government assistance.

It seems to me, however, that this law will have an unintended consequence that could have serious negative consequences for the state of Florida: to reduce the feeling among immigrants and their children that we live in a fair and just society. Continue reading »

 

The New York Times published a piece today speculating why 40% of incoming college freshman who are leaning towards majoring in math, science, or engineering end up either dropping out or majoring in a non-technical field. The article further notes that the percentage of engineering and computer science degrees has dropped steadily in recent years–and all of that despite presidential and Congressional initiatives to push for an increase in the number of American students who are adequately trained in mathematics and the sciences. The New York Times speculates three reasons for these trends:

1) Low-Level math and science courses tend to be boring and overcrowded lectures that involve mostly rote learning.
2) Low-Level math and science courses tend to grade substantially harder than other college courses.
Continue reading »

 

It’s really easy to feel like you aren’t doing enough to protect your children. But how much is too much?

I say this as someone who takes his young nephews to the park on a pretty regular basis. My general philosophy is that there is very little that can go wrong on a playground. My job is to watch them to make sure that they don’t do anything too reckless and to encourage them to stretch their boundaries. But if a kid wants to climb a jungle gym that the warning label says he’s too young for, or he wants to climb up a slide the wrong direction, my reaction is usually “go for it.” And then I sit back and nervously watch them, idly wondering where the nearest emergency room is.

Of course, compared to the nannies and young mothers that I see at the park (and I’m not stereotyping here; in my experience it is incredibly rare for a man to take children to a park on a weekday morning) I am a reckless caregiver. They tell their children not to climb jungle gyms if it is at all challenging, not to walk up a slide backwards, not to play with sticks, not to run too fast…. And I’ve had them tell me to not let my child do those things, because it is dangerous and they don’t want their kids getting any bad ideas. On the one hand, I feel sorry for those kids; on the other hand, a part of me wonders if I am doing something wrong.
Continue reading »

© 2012 leftfielder.org login Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha