According to a New York Times article, Florida education officials recently released a set of rules requiring that all incoming students must demonstrate that their parents are legal Florida residents before they can receive in-state tuition to any public college or university. The rule, which does not affect admission, is supposedly aimed at illegal immigrants, who will find their tuition quadrupling.

While I cannot speak for the authors of the rule, my guess is that there are two reasons behind the increase:

1) To disincentivize living in Florida if you are an illegal immigrant
2) To respond to a general complaint among some voters that illegal immigrants do not pay their fair share to society, and should not be rewarded with any kind of government assistance.

It seems to me, however, that this law will have an unintended consequence that could have serious negative consequences for the state of Florida: to reduce the feeling among immigrants and their children that we live in a fair and just society. Continue reading »

 

Both of the top Republicans in the House and Senate have now expressed support for rewriting the 14th Amendment. Their goal? To prevent the children of illegal immigrants from becoming American citizens. Thankfully, it will never happen, for reasons that I’ll get to in a bit. I say “thankfully” because it’s a dumb idea that would have disastrous consequences for the United States. It also happens to be really bad politics, and if the GOP actually does push this policy they might as well just disband at let some other conservative party come to the forefront.
Continue reading »

 

Based on the media reports, I was having a hard time figuring out what was in Arizona’s new and controversial immigration law, so I looked it up directly. The conclusion? This law is a recipe both for confusion and for a spike in lawsuits against Arizona police departments. Oh, and if you are in the country legally but you aren’t a US citizen, stay the heck away from that place.
Continue reading »

 

The Supreme Court just decided to take on an extremely interesting, and difficult, case. Back in 2004, Congress passed the Identity Theft Penalty Enhancement Act that mandated a two year prison sentence for anyone who “knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person” (called “aggravated identity theft”). The difficulty is that the Justice Department has started charging illegal immigrants with this crime; people who use fake social security numbers, but who never knowingly used them to impersonate another person. Of course, in most cases the Justice Department really isn’t interested in charging people with that crime–they would rather deport someone now than hold them for two years in federal prison–but they are using the charge to cajole illegal immigrants into pleading guilty to lesser immigration charges; in other words, if you decide to fight your deportation, then we’ll throw the book at you.
Continue reading »

 

As you’ve probably noticed, I’ve spent a lot more time lately talking about the GOP primary than the Democratic primary. Mostly this is because the Democratic primary has been pretty uninteresting lately. Clinton is obviously the front-runner, Obama the contender, and Edwards the dark horse. The differences between the candidates largely come down to style, experience, and rhetoric. (FYI, I’m personally leaning towards Obama, but I haven’t made up my mind yet.) And the campaigns themselves largely seem to recognize this; sure they swipe at each other occasionally, but even at their worst you still get the feeling that they respect each other at the end of the day.

The GOP primary, on the other hand, is fascinating. At times the candidates have really gone after each other pretty viciously, the press darling changes every couple weeks, and there are five candidates who could realistically walk away with the nomination. More importantly, the GOP primary is really boiling down to a referendum on the future of the party. A vote for Huckabee is a solid vote for social conservativism, but also against the Club for Growth, whereas a vote for Giuliani is a solid vote for the preeminence of foreign policy concerns and against the Family Research Council. Not to mention the actor who has been labeled as boring, the Mormon trying to appeal to Southern evangelicals who are regularly taught in church that Mormonism is a cult, the libertarian running on foreign policy concerns, and the Congressmen with the Spanish last name running on an anti-immigration platform. This is great stuff, here folks, so forgive me if I dwell on it.

Anyway, on Sunday the GOP candidates met in a debate in Miami, conducted in Spanish and sponsored by Univision. It was an interesting debate, and I recommend that you read the transcript. (If you want to compare them, here is a transcript of the Democratic Univision debate in September. Both transcripts are in English.) The debate itself focuses on immigration, but it is also the rare debate to question the GOP contenders on health care and education–issues that are likely to come up repeatedly in the general election.

Continue reading »

© 2012 leftfielder.org login Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha